↓ Skip to main content

Genome

Nonrecurrent MECP2 duplications mediated by genomic architecture-driven DNA breaks and break-induced replication repair

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Research, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Nonrecurrent MECP2 duplications mediated by genomic architecture-driven DNA breaks and break-induced replication repair
Published in
Genome Research, April 2008
DOI 10.1101/gr.075903.107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marijke Bauters, Hilde Van Esch, Michael J. Friez, Odile Boespflug-Tanguy, Martin Zenker, Angela M. Vianna-Morgante, Carla Rosenberg, Jaakko Ignatius, Martine Raynaud, Karen Hollanders, Karen Govaerts, Kris Vandenreijt, Florence Niel, Pierre Blanc, Roger E. Stevenson, Jean-Pierre Fryns, Peter Marynen, Charles E. Schwartz, Guy Froyen

Abstract

Recurrent submicroscopic genomic copy number changes are the result of nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR). Nonrecurrent aberrations, however, can result from different nonexclusive recombination-repair mechanisms. We previously described small microduplications at Xq28 containing MECP2 in four male patients with a severe neurological phenotype. Here, we report on the fine-mapping and breakpoint analysis of 16 unique microduplications. The size of the overlapping copy number changes varies between 0.3 and 2.3 Mb, and FISH analysis on three patients demonstrated a tandem orientation. Although eight of the 32 breakpoint regions coincide with low-copy repeats, none of the duplications are the result of NAHR. Bioinformatics analysis of the breakpoint regions demonstrated a 2.5-fold higher frequency of Alu interspersed repeats as compared with control regions, as well as a very high GC content (53%). Unexpectedly, we obtained the junction in only one patient by long-range PCR, which revealed nonhomologous end joining as the mechanism. Breakpoint analysis in two other patients by inverse PCR and subsequent array comparative genomic hybridization analysis demonstrated the presence of a second duplicated region more telomeric at Xq28, of which one copy was inserted in between the duplicated MECP2 regions. These data suggest a two-step mechanism in which part of Xq28 is first inserted near the MECP2 locus, followed by breakage-induced replication with strand invasion of the normal sister chromatid. Our results indicate that the mechanism by which copy number changes occur in regions with a complex genomic architecture can yield complex rearrangements.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 84 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 24%
Researcher 19 22%
Professor 10 11%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Research
#4,034
of 4,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,378
of 95,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Research
#33
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.